Naresh Jain compares coding agents building the same API service with and without a behavioral harness. A frontier model, GPT-6 Sol, passed every external evaluation either way. But a cost-optimized model, GPT-6 Luna, succeeded in only 3 of 10 unharnessed runs and all 10 with the harness. While adding the harness increased token usage and runtime for Luna, the harnessed Luna runs achieved the same 10-for-10 reliability as GPT-6 Sol while costing 33% less per run ($0.273 vs $0.406). This experiment suggests a behavioral harness might be a practical way to get dependable results from smaller, cost-optimized models.
Are Harnesses Worth the Cost?
找兴趣 找喜欢
- How to Be a Successful Trader
- U.S. Stocks Might Not Be as Expensive as You Think
- Sarah Guo - The Power of Conviction
- What If You Only Invested at Stock Market Peaks?
- Paper, Rocks or Digits: What Makes the Best Money?
- Gokul Rajaram - Lessons from Investing in 700 Companies
- Money for the Rest of Us Update
- Canya (CAN) Update - 'Where are they now?'
- How To Teach Children About Money
- Why You Shouldn't Trade






